|
|
|
|
|
|
by agentultra
4821 days ago
|
|
|
I'd try to over-come 2. I had a chip on my shoulder when I was your age too. I came from a poor rural Canadian town, raised by a single disabled mother, and spent most of my time out of school because I was being bullied and nothing could be done about it. The problem with 2 is that there is too much luck involved hitting home-runs. If you base your sense of accomplishment on that chip in your shoulder you will only be greatly disappointed later in life. There's nothing to prove. You only have yourself to compete with. |
|
|
Do you know how old I am? :-)
> The problem with 2 is that there is too much luck involved hitting home-runs. If you base your sense of accomplishment on that chip in your shoulder you will only be greatly disappointed later in life.
That's a fair point, but it's more than just the "chip on the shoulder" effect. It's also, as I said, about demonstrating - to the people who have supported me, and shown belief in me - that their belief was justified. And that's something that matters to me. Sadly, some of those people are getting older (my parents, for example) which contributes to my desire to work harder, since I want to accomplish something in their lifetimes.
> You only have yourself to compete with.
I agree with that to a point. But combined with
> There's nothing to prove.
I would argue that I do have something to prove... to myself. I need to know what I'm capable of achieving, and if I give less than 100% effort, I'll always have to look back and ask "what could I have done if I'd really given my all"?