|
|
|
|
|
by antr
4814 days ago
|
|
(i) Facebook did not raise $2.24bn, it was much (much) less. That $2.24bn figure, which comes from Crunchbase, includes secondary equity sale (shares sold by employees, early investors, etc. to third party investors like DST). That cash was not seen by Facebook. (ii) Facebook and Twitter raised so much capital later on to support real user/activity growth, the primary use of proceeds was not fund their ongoing burn rate. The $41m raised by FourSquare is going to finance current operations/burn rate, not growth. |
|
http://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases-test/facebook-raises...
Regarding point ii, what expenses do you see as under each category? I'm not denying the difference; I'm just not clear what you think is being done differently with the money.