|
|
|
|
|
by jellicle
4813 days ago
|
|
Has nothing to do with "innovation", since nearly all healthcare research is paid for by the U.S. government anyway, and it's much less money than you think. The claimed expenses for "research" are mostly about bringing slight variations of drugs to market in order to extend patent protections - that is, they are rent-seeking. > "More than four fifths of all funds for basic research to discover new drugs and vaccines come from public sources." http://www.bmj.com/content/345/bmj.e4348?ijkey=Y1g4ZVUImIbtX... The story of healthcare costs in the U.S. is entirely to do with profits for drug companies and hospitals, and has almost nothing to do with "innovation". |
|
You can discover a new drug for a few tens of millions of dollars. Now to get that drug to market? You need to cough up a few hundred million dollars.
Discovering a drug doesn't save any patients, getting it to market does and THAT is paid for by private companies.