|
|
|
|
|
by wizzard
4811 days ago
|
|
I don't think he's literally saying it would be cheap. He's just saying that the fact that they can get away with not having support means not many people _require_ support, and therefore if support were made available theoretically not many people would take advantage of it. Which I don't necessarily agree with, but I think the point is worth considering and not "ass-backwards" or completely illogical. |
|