[jmgunn87]

i would say not bad but the fact you are asking me to pay to use it when i can have something like d3 is a bit of a joke

[avolcano]

As someone who has used D3, I think you are vastly underestimating the audience of D3 users who would happily pay for a far easier solution ;)

(do agree with other comments that per-dev pricing is a bad model, though)

[hmottestad]

D3 takes ages to build graphs with. That's why NVD3 made such big news.

What you get when you buy a license is support. Which I remember was the main reason we had for not choosing NVD3 last time, and went with a library with much better documentation.

[jmgunn87]

why is everyone these days so afraid of investing time? d3 is well worth the time invested learning!

[josephfung]

It's not about being afraid of investing time, but rather assigning more value to time than the licensing fees.