Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by coldtea 4815 days ago
>If we are hiring you because you are awesome, then you have 30 days to do something awesome. And awesome is simply defined as me (or your supervisor) thinking to him/herself, “man, that's awesome!” just once.

"You have 30 days to do something awesome"? Really?

Well, how about you stuffing your job offer you know where?

Professionals, including trained Computer Science and IT professionals, demand professional respect. They are there to solve specific needs. In our case code quality code, iterate, engineer and polish programs to completion, ensure a solid architecture for your offering, and all that.

Programming is not a parlor trick, and employees are not trained dogs to do back flips at will for your amusement.

The sense of self-entitlement of those BS managers always amuses me. As if your shitty startup is the be all end all, and people should be grateful and "amaze you" for having given them work. Like some decadent Roman emperor towards his circus act: "amuse me or die".

Not to mention that amazing some exec with something "awesome", as everybody has witnessed at some point, can be miles away from shipping solid code and solving the company's real problems keeping it from sinking.

5 comments

Not to mention that my ability to do something awesome in the first 30 days is in no small part dependent upon how well designed your onboarding process is, your systems' level of documentation, and how much BS I have to put up with day to day, none of which are in my control. In other words, unless you're GitHub, there's no way for me to know before accepting the offer whether I would feasibly be able to ship something awesome in 3 days or 3 months.
Yes, there's a pretty fine intersection between stuff that is "awesome" and stuff that is actually hard, especially if you are pitching to non technical types.

Carefully design a distributed system so that it handles all of the one-in-a-million concurrency edge cases correctly , logs exceptions properly and has proper tests and documentation; hard but not "awesome".

Creating an HTML page and filling it up with jquery plugins , "totally rad dude!"

Mild overstatements aside, I completely agree with the sentiment here, and would have made almost exactly the same mild overstatements myself, had I thought of them first. :)
It would be awesome if you made us billionaires by the end of the month...
Well said. Just because you have a company does not mean you own me ass hole. And I have a life outside work. Shove it deep in there.

By the way, what was it that makes you or your company so entitled to think you can judge me? Did you guys ship a awesome product or made a pretty penny or invent something fundamental in Computer Science?