|
|
|
|
|
by e12e
4821 days ago
|
|
It's great that you're doing this, and listing stuff like standard deviation in the tables -- but I'd say your focus/interpretation of the data isn't quite right. At least provide the option to sort by standard deviation -- as that might well be more interesting than requests/second? Maybe I'm just being mean because I was reminded of this essay by Zed Shaw earlier today (I was looking for his alluded rant on CC licenses, which I didn't find): http://zedshaw.com/essays/programmer_stats.html For instance, you state that: > In this week's tests, we have added latency tab (available using the rightmost tab at the top of this panel). On i7, we see that several frameworks are able to provide a response in under 10 milliseconds. Only Cake PHP requires more than 100 milliseconds.
Only cake php requires more than 100 milliseconds on average. But look at Django: Average around 60 ms, standard deviation around 90 ms (!). Not to mention a "worst" score of 1.4 seconds. |
|
As pfalls said, we're definitely open to different ways to present the data. More sorting would be cool.