|
|
|
|
|
|
by T-hawk
4817 days ago
|
|
|
> FizzBuzz is useful only to weed out perhaps the lower 5% of the developers population Problem is, that 5% represents way more than 5% of the pool of job applicants, since it's those folks that continuously get rejected from jobs and keep applying. Any company hiring developers needs a decent FizzBuzz filter to sort out this riff-raff. > There is no place for a FizzBuzz once the company is already engaging In a technical and sharp company, yeah. In a company where the resumes go through HR and nontechnical managers, such that the first point of any technical evaluation is in the interview itself, then yeah that interviewer is going to need a FizzBuzz. And this is distressingly common in companies who hire some software developers but whose primary domain is not technology, like medicine or shipping or education. |
|
|