[bpatrianakos]

Yeah, I'm sure that's what the marketing department's first choice was.

I think this entire line of discussion is coming from a place of thinking way too much about it. Tinmark's cofounder's answer above is exactly what I was going to say. There's nothing dishonest about and below the headline there are 3 lines of text that very clearly state what a user would be getting. There's nothing ambiguous about the explanation.

[mkmkmmmmm]

I think the title is dishonest, but not egregiously so. It's not a real problem, you are right about that.