|
|
|
|
|
by nivla
4823 days ago
|
|
>Not that convenient when you move from Windows Server n (based on Windows x) and have to relearn to navigate around the entirely different Windows Server n+3 (which is based on the tablet-friendly Windows x+1). But a lot more convenient than switching OS. Most FOSS server softwares are written for Linux. Switching to them requires you to learn OS specific commands, switches, and workarounds. It is more convenient to stick to what you are already familiar with. >I never had much trouble with Google paid support Exactly. Thanks for proving my previous point that support is subjective. The common consensus is Google's support is terrible to non-existent but in reality it is subjective like others. Other's over exaggerate the lack of Google's support like you did with Microsoft's. |
|
And from that point on, you only switch when you want to, not when your database provider decides that in order to get the latest feature you must also upgrade your server OS to a tablet-friendly one... And even when you switch, you realize the new software is just like the old one, just better.
> exaggerate the lack of Google's support like you did with Microsoft's.
A friend of mine worked at a Brazilian bank that made the outlandishly stupid decision to base all backend operations on SQL Server. My horror stories are nothing compared to his.