|
|
|
|
|
|
by jacques_chester
4832 days ago
|
|
|
Right, creating new markets. That's fine. But basically the failure rate on it is atrocious. If you find a different new market that is immediately adjacent, what's the smart move? When I studied nature-inspired computation, my professor quipped at one point that nature-inspired optimisation algorithms usually show what you got wrong about your problem definition. Markets are the same. Nobody swoops down like Batman with a flawless plan and mastermind insight that turns out to be perfectly correct. The airport business books might give that impression, but it's total bullshit. What actually happens is that millions of men and women swoop down like Batman and discover that they're not backed by Bruce Wayne and a friendly script editor. Once in a while somebody stumbles onto something good and then their history is rewritten to fit the monomyth. |
|
|