|
|
|
|
|
by reeses
4835 days ago
|
|
Obviously, you can do the same things in Java, as people have demonstrated with alternative languages that target the JVM. It's the expressiveness at the language level that is really the "magic". For example, doing the equivalent of OO is not intuitive in Erlang, but completely possible (actually easy, but it looks...wrong) whereas it's supported by every Java tool. By the same token, pattern-matched message passing, lightweight green threads, and hot code deployment are primary concepts in Erlang. |
|