Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by TheEskimo 4830 days ago
Chrome's UI is also completely and totally inflexible. As you can see in this screenshot, http://i.imgur.com/D8rMRBa.png , my firefox's UI takes up less space and is only two rows. Chrome has three rows (the close/max/min buttons, tabs, and navigation). There is no way on windows to reduce that top height. Firefox is flexible enough that you can trivially do what I have with only some simple css. The defaults for firefox are roughly as minimalistic as chrome too. Also, on my linux box my firefox is thinned down even more, while chrome just looks horribly out of place since you can't alter its appearance to closer match the native environment.

I prefer firefox for quite a few reasons, but since you bring up the UI, that's the only one I'll mention here.
2 comments
progrock 4823 days ago
Actually both browsers look out of place on my Linux box, because they deviate from the desktop theme. I'd rather they looked native. It's really window manager territory. I'm sick of the inconsistencies with tab control etc, accross applications.

At the end of the day, both UIs are primitive. I'm of the believe that the browser can be so much move than a web page viewer.

link
glitchdout 4830 days ago
What windows is that? In windows 7 the tabs touch the top of the screen. You can't get any more minimal than that.
link
DanBC 4830 days ago
On my Windows 7 there's a big huge bar behind the tabs. (This was also there on OS X, and that's worse because of the OS X menu bar which is unremovable)

I really really want an easy way to squidge that background bar down a bit.

link
TheEskimo 4830 days ago
This is windows 7. Notice that neither of them are maximized. The behavior you talk about only occurs when you maximize the window, not when it is "half-maximized" as shown.
link