The reason Thatcher was so successful though is that she worked like a man. You don't earn the "Iron Lady" nickname for being the one to talk to around the water cooler.
That said, although I like the sentiment it was a pretty rubbish article, if you could even call it that.
It's also quite clear that gender has little to do with it aside from the likelihood of a particular gender to have the more positive traits in question.
In order to paint a picture one must occasionally use the odd broad brush stroke.
Identifying common traits of a group, if those those traits are correctly identified, doesn't conflict with the possibility than not all members of a group may have those traits.
We on HN commonly discuss eg, the entrepreneurial culture of the US vs other countries. I don't see this as being significantly different.
This article consisted of three very broad, virtually meaningless brushstrokes.
I'm not opposed to articles that aren't "PC" but seriously, if you're going to make these types of claims based on "fifteen years of experience", you need to go into much more depth and tie into secondary sources.
That said, although I like the sentiment it was a pretty rubbish article, if you could even call it that.
It's also quite clear that gender has little to do with it aside from the likelihood of a particular gender to have the more positive traits in question.