| "The difference is what they actually do to make money - by creating value or by putting in money." Are you seriously telling me that the next XYZ social media startup is creating more value than the VC that's investing in new technology? the 2010-2013 landscape is much different than you seem to think. " most entrepreneurs put it all on the line when they try to bootstrap a startup (remember most startups don't successfully raise)." Many if not most entrepreneurs already made their FU money or already had a cash reserve. Do you think Dorsey was putting it all on the line with Square? Do you think Bill Gates was putting it all on the line with Microsoft (his grandfather already set up a million-dollar trust fund in his name before he started)? Do you think that Mark Zuckerberg would be on the street if Facebook flopped? Do you think Bill Nguyen was putting it all on the line with Color? "Most people would very comfortable with 100K, NYC or not... just the fact you have a decent, dependable salary for several years makes it cushy compared to a startup." If the business could blow up tomorrow or in six months, the salary is far from dependable. (unfortunately I'm also in a precarious position) And yes, in many startups the people are drawing living salaries. "Entreprenuers put much more in a startup than money" And VCs don't? It's an exaggeration perpetrated in particular by accelerators. Most VCs offer something on top of money -- be it connections, mentorship, opportunities to sell to friends. Speaking from the side of having invested in others' startups, it's not a worthwhile investment if I can't actively do something to help improve the odds of success. While it doesn't seem like hard work, making and keeping connections involves lots of time and energy. |
And while your personal experience may differ, the vast majority of VCs are strictly "dumb money" and add very little value beyond investment. Those that do are the exception, not the rule.