|
|
|
A "GET" request can land you in Jail
|
|
10 points
by narayanb
4841 days ago
|
|
After reading through the judgment of Andrew Auernheimer case, I feel really taken aback and scared! How could calling 'public' GET API be unauthorized action?
How could the judgment be passed so fast and carelessly?
And why aren't the AT&T 'subscribers' suing them for keeping their private information insecure? Frankly, now as a developer every time I make a "GET" request, I have this fear of getting jailed! |
|
That said, I don't think AT&T would necessarily have reacted well to an attempt at real responsible disclosure.
For an example of the ideal scenario for how this should be handled, there's the Steam data leak that Ars Technica found: http://www.gibsonindex.org/blog/2013/02/06/steam-leak/ - I rated it as a Level Zero event on my cyber attack ranking blog, because of the proper resolution.
I agree that the blame in this case lies mostly with AT&T. It's their responsibility to protect the data. They build the program so that if anyone asked it for anyone else's info, it went "OK, sounds good, here you go."
Weev was the one who asked. AT&T should be on the hook for answering.