Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by arbuge 4835 days ago
Disagreed. The facts are indeed that AT&T made this freely available... my definition of making something available is that it is readily available for the taking, whether I desired to give it away or not. If I leave my front door open due to negligence, I probably don't desire to be burglarized, but it is true to say that I have made my house contents freely available. If my house contents include a laptop full of people's private data, then I think it's reasonable I should face some penalties.

As to your other point, AT&T is responsible for the actions of its contractors as well as for its full-time employees.

1 comments

For anyone with a little knowledge about locks and basic tools, no conventional door lock prevents entry. So by your logic, nearly all house contents are freely available.

Regarding AT&T, it's not a question of responsibility - it's a question of a level of fault that is negligent. At some level, it's your responsibility because you gave AT&T your data, right? At some level, it's your responsibility because you have an email address, right?

Without a detailed assessment of many factors, just throwing out there that AT&T is negligent seems to be fairly irresponsible.

Nah. If I give any website my email address, I have a reasonable expectation it won't be published on that website in a public manner ripe for harvesting. Unless of course the Ts&Cs I'm signing explicitly say it will (somewhere prominent, preferably in bold red with flashing letters).
They're not negligent? Would you like them to handle your private data in this fashion? How about your children's data?