[joezydeco]

There's two angles I see:

1) Business travelers can expense the checked bag fee, so they don't care.

2) Other travelers still have a free option: the carry-on bag.

I always board my flights last for various reasons, and I've noticed how people are literally hanging over the ropes to get in the boarding line when their section is called. It started making sense when the staff would announce that ALL overheads were now full. People were packing even more into those carryons.

[ams6110]

Which is why the checked bag fee never made any sense to me. They should be charging a carry-on fee instead. Carry-ons are a PITA for the airlines, with all the time the stowage adds to the boarding process.

[prakashk]

> _They should be charging a carry-on fee instead._

At least one airline, Spirit Air, already does. I am sure more will follow this practice.

[gcb0]

but they are also a PITA for the passenger. It's all a matter of creating problems to sell solutions.

and if it wasn't, lobbying sure made thanks to the liquid rule.