|
|
|
|
|
|
by statictype
4846 days ago
|
|
|
and implying they're hippie kumbaya love-ins instead of a huge, well-supported tool with the features he implies they lack I don't see this in the article anywhere. Sounds like you're trying to create controversy where there isn't one. |
|
|
But you can't deny Spolsky's spin can you? That GitHub isn't quite corporate-oriented because "contributions can come from volunteers all over the Internet, many of whom are happy to fork the code for their own needs."
Corporate. Volunteer. Happy. Their. Own. Needs.
Pick the odd one out.