|
|
|
|
|
by bsimpson
4843 days ago
|
|
I don't have a horse in this race, but I feel like this ship has sailed. Personally, I don't like jQuery's API, but it has become so popular that it's the honorary JavaScript standard library. I'd be hesitant to start a new project using MooTools, knowing that most people I might hire or most frameworks I might want to incorporate later probably know/expect jQuery. I feel like GitHub has done the same thing for Git. Mercurial is in Python, which in theory would make it easier for me to hack on if I ever needed to, but the community has settled on Git. I think the fact that Atlassian bought BitBucket, which was a boutique version control tool for Pythonistas, and the very first thing they did was add Git support and position it as an alternative to GitHub speaks volumes to this. I know that there are people who prefer Mercurial, and I'm glad they have that choice, but I feel like choosing Mercurial over Git for a new project is swimming upstream without any real benefit. |
|