[alive-or-not]

Such a stupid statement. There should be world peace. The world population should be 300 million for a sustainable future.

There were many advanced distributed data systems on the Internet in the early 90's, the Web won to a big degree because of it's simplicity.

[nawitus]

Calling someone stupid is not very nice. You can very well disagree with my opinion, but you can do that without being rude.

Your analogy of comparing a different technical solution to world peace seems pretty ridiculous, too.

[jacoblyles]

Man, the earth would suck with 300 million people. We'd lose 80% of our culture and technology. Imagine a world where the only settled country was the USA.

[iso-8859-1]

sustainability is more important than culture and technology.

[jacoblyles]

reducing the human population ought to be the last resort, for a humanist.