|
|
|
|
|
|
by ch0wn
4852 days ago
|
|
|
Whether right or wrong, I personally prefer the Python way and I'm not a particular fan of Tim Toady. Especially when working in teams, it's simply easier if you don't have to make up rules, but it's clear upfront what to use, because there is no need for discussion. |
|
|
One (ruby/perl: &&, python: and) is used to evaluate truthness of two expressions.
The other (ruby/perl: and, python: N/A) is more of a program flow operator. Now that I think about it.. If it is a Tim Toady, it is more of _if_ vs _and_ rather than _&&_ vs _and_.