|
|
|
|
|
by eksith
4849 days ago
|
|
Yes, I have, but...
Jekyll is done in ruby, octopress is a layer on top of it This kinda defeats the "simple" bit doesn't it? ;) I have nothing against these and if that floats your boat, then by all means, use it. But just the idea of not having to install anything (in fact, nothing) extra and just having this all work with a single file is very appealing to me. |
|
I guess I was thinking of "simple" in terms of the static HTML and deploy. I don't think you actually have to run any Ruby commands, you just run a command line task and it reads the textfiles from the specified directory.
Unless I missed it in the OP's description, one huge advantage that Jekyll has over the OP's bash solution is the ability to write in Markdown, made possible by the inclusion of Markdown parsing Ruby libraries. So the complexity added in the framework part, IMO, is more than made up in the simplicity of actual content-production.