|
|
|
|
|
by jacques_chester
4859 days ago
|
|
Advertising sucks because worldwide inventory grows faster than the supply of eyeball-hours to view the ads. So there's constant downward pressure on prices. Subscription sucks because you have to fight subscriber fatigue ... if you can get someone to sign up at all. People sweat over $5/month memberships; meanwhile they spend $20/wk on coffee. Micropayments suck because everyone hates the mental overhead. I have a solution I call "microsubscription". The only problem is that it's been tried by others and failed. Naturally I feel I've got the magic ingredients that the others didn't have, but ... we'll see. |
|
Like I mentioned in my latest blog post[0],
> Real time bidding engines are getting more and more intelligent, and would be able to guess with quite good results, how valuable a user is to the advertiser. This allows the advertiser to only pay high amounts for audiences that matter to their ROI, while paying low amounts to audiences that don’t.
> What happens is then this: a segregation of high paying advertisers and low paying advertisers form. When I say high paying advertisers I mean advertisers who would pay high for the right audience. They will pay significantly higher than the low paying advertisers, who would “spray and pray” their ads in hopes of reaching the right audience.
I maintain that if a startup is able to build the correct audiences (StackOverflow building an audience of IT professionals for example), the revenue from advertising will be substantial.
[0] http://blog.chewxy.com/2013/03/06/startup-business-models-ad...