|
|
|
|
|
by zentrus
4859 days ago
|
|
I'm having trouble understanding how a wrapper for an arbitrary executable can be called "RESTful". Are there resources? Are there long-lived URIs? In the end, doesn't the implementation of the executable partly determine whether it is really RESTful? |
|
Certainly long-lived URI's. As for resources, I suppose conceptually there is. However you are correct that the given executable would determine a level for resources. So I guess the answer is YES. Support for RESTul is RESTful. Or not, depending upon your executable.