Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by arocks 4860 days ago
What makes you think I didn't? The author seems to agree with me. He even concludes that we should improve the implementation rather than the language for optimisation.
3 comments

I didn't get that from the presentation at all. What I read is a guy complaining that idiomatic Python is necessarily slow because it depends, for its clarity and terseness, on not controlling allocations or memory layout, and that Python- the- language abets the problem by having its standard library build on the same idiom.
No, the author concludes that languages based on hash table lookups and lacking copy avoidance mechanisms are inherently slower.
Which makes your comment useless and redundant. The very point of the presentation pretty much being "this declaration makes no sense"