[moepstar]

>> Don't know why anyone would trust them.

I don't know about you, but i give everyone the benefit of doubt and unless someone violates this trust, i'd think most people do too.

Also, at least i tend to think of registrars as some kind of neutral entity that i, indeed, can trust - guess there are some exceptions to the rule.

How many years and years of abuse has it taken for people to notice what GoD*ddy has been doing all that time and finally cause some sort of mass-defect to other registrars..

Hopefully, the level of tolerance for this behavior is of an all-time low so registrars simply can't afford to abuse the trust of their customers any longer.

[rgbrenner]

"I don't know about you, but i give everyone the benefit of doubt and unless someone violates this trust, i'd think most people do too."

True.. and I used to trust registrars to manage my DNS.. but over the years, this is at least the 3rd or 4th time this has happened with a registrar I am on (yes, I have domains at name.com).

Since I don't have time to interrogate every registrars DNS server when I sign up, I just assume it's useless these days. + I end up having to pay for a DNS service anyway, to avoid the bad registrars DNS.. so it's easier to use a single DNS service for all of the domains.

[pi18n]

This is what happened. For example, I previously gave Name.com the benefit of the doubt and sent them an email asking them to fix the issue. They did not, so now I mention this every time I see their service mentioned. They are scum just like GoDaddy but on a lower scale.