Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by Muzza 4852 days ago
> Women should have the right to take lengthy maternity leaves

And the cost should be borne by single men.

6 comments

Screw you, seriously. You want to remove childbearers from the workforce? You want to reduce everyone's employment experiences by diminishing the market of employees and ideas? You want your ten bucks a year so that you can say you don't support single mothers (note -- extensive public health research demonstrates that productivity and well-being of women of child-bearing age is the best indicator of the overall health of a society)?

Why should society give you anything at all? Why should my tax dollars go towards protecting you from crime, or paying your emergency room bills? And I mean you, specifically, not people in general -- if you don't want to contibute to make everyone's lot better, why should anyone give a crap about you, or for that matter your opinions?

I see I hit a sore spot. I don't really want to remove childbearers from the workforce, but I do want a frank discussion about who bears the costs. Actually, just an admission of the inherent injustice of the system would be nice. Ten bucks a year? Screw you. I pay roughly 70% of my income in taxes every year.

And holy thoughtcrime Batman! Despite paying tens of thousands of dollars every year in taxes, all government services should be denied to me just because of my opinions?

http://mises.org/daily/2485

Small price to pay for the continuation of the species.

Quit your whining. Maybe they should build a nursery for the single men, too.

Single men who never had a mother then.
Yeah, dudes who intend to never reproduce should get some sort of tax credit as long as they submit to a sterilization procedure.
And promise never to collect Social Security...
The tax credits and possible cost of guaranteed time off with pay for having children is nothing compared to the immense cost of raising children that will pay future taxes to allow for the continuance of government and government services.
Comments like this make me think that the cost should indeed be borne by single men, exclusively.
I don't think you've thought that through. A straight-out bachelor tax would simply make bachelors work less. Tax revenue would fall, and there would be even less money for you leftists to redistribute to women.
No, but... just for a while... just to spite them...