If you selectively quote, why not at least make an effort instead of just quoting what seems to reinforce your point of view, ignoring the critique of your standpoint?
There doesn't seem to be a point trying to argue with you, since you already decided that you are right and therefore beyond critique.
If you can actually argue your point instead of just off-handedly quoting wrongly equated wikipedia articles then please do, since I'd be interested in hearing you out. Otherwise, what's the point?
There doesn't seem to be a point trying to argue with you, since you already decided that you are right and therefore beyond critique.
If you can actually argue your point instead of just off-handedly quoting wrongly equated wikipedia articles then please do, since I'd be interested in hearing you out. Otherwise, what's the point?