[fluidcruft]

I got this gem after refusing again today:

http://imgur.com/heHWkzG

What the hell. "Are you sure?" Well, yes I am. None of buttons answer that question.

I just wanted to watch the damn video link someone sent me. Jesus. I'll be sure to logout next time.

[btipling]

That's not actually a bad thing, YouTube comments are very bad and anything they can do to improve that is OK, including requiring a real name.

[fluidcruft]

That's fine except I wasn't trying to comment. I was just trying to view some trivial video shared by a family member.

Instead I was assaulted with this UI atrocity forcing me to evaluate some complicated modal dialog before I could even view the damn video. I mean, look at it: it's a pretty clear yes/no question with three confusing answer buttons and none of the labels answer the question posed at the top.

I could tolerate it if it happened when I tried to upload, comment, like, report or favorite something, but just to watch? If I had been logged out I wouldn't have been hassled by this. Apparently my sin is having bothered to create an account at some point in the past when I just wanted to click the like button as feedback to some poster. Why is it so unreasonable to like things without endorsing them? I guess the answer it to delete my youtube account and lurk moar. Fine. This is exactly what wil warned about.

[anoncow]

Sadly youtube is now entrenched. Everybody else is a fringe player.

[anoncow]

Whatever happened to freedom of speech. This is exactly what autocrats everywhere want and even we now believe it to be good - just because of youtube comments. Comments which reflect the real us. With a real name policy it will be replaced by a few polite lines with emoticons.

[btipling]

Freedom of speech seems to be very important to you but you do not seem to understand it well. YouTube is not a product of the government.

[rhizome]

Then require a real name rather than these passive aggressive, evermore-obscure by turns, login modals.