[hencq]

Except this wasn't a 'fake article' (whatever that means). Sure, there were some valid criticisms over the accuracy of the reporter's notes, but overall the conclusions seemed valid. They weren't even overly negative; just that the car doesn't quite compare to cars with petrol (or diesel) engines for long distances in cold weather.

I found Musk's reaction overly aggressive and coming off as petty. He pointed out inaccuracies, though none seemed to contradict the conclusions of the article. What's more, his accusation of malicious intent was very serious and completely unsupported. It's nice to see a CEO that's emotionally invested in his company's products, but he'd might be better off with a cooler head handling PR.