Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by lostnet 4862 days ago
Having worked mostly remotely for a company that was going slowly down the drain, I can say that I was more productive.. But I was the first to jump ship when their buyout looked unfavorable to engineering.

Companies in yahoo's state don't necessarily care about current output (what good is more of what isn't working?)

A report I reviewed in the past indicated remote workers are more likely to walk away when a bad changes are occurring. For yahoo, that means now and/or soon.

1 comments

So the aim of this was to shake loose the less loyal employees and/or to encourage 'fence-sitters' to be in an environment where they would be less likely to leave as the company circles the drain?

I don't now that doesn't seem like the purpose behind this.