|
|
|
|
|
by beambot
4862 days ago
|
|
I've ranted on this topic before [1]. I still think it's a bit dishonest... academics shouldn't promote their work to general audiences without properly denoting caveats. In this case... they're using a ~$50k vicon motion capture system that returns millimeter-precision pose estimates at ~1kHz. [1] http://www.hizook.com/blog/2012/07/02/being-honest-robot-vid... Without the vicon and (probably) a central control PC, this feat would be SUPER difficult -- by ~1-2 orders of magnitude. The real problem is: when someone does solve that herculean problem, the general public won't care. They'll just say, "eh, we've seen that before." |
|
I'm no expert, but I would imagine that research using remote viewing and centralized processing is just a first step that could make it easier to validate particular solutions, which can then be "baked into" self-contained platforms.