Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by askimto 4867 days ago
CAP is not applicable here from what I can tell. Glad to know Coda Hale understands it though. Sounds like a real nice guy.
2 comments

Just call me an asshole already and have done with it.
Forgive my ignorance, but why isn't CAP applicable here?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/CAP_theorem

How does consistency apply here for example?

Consistency applies because a least-conns load balancer requires state: it needs to know how many connections are open for each node. A distributed least-conns load balancer requires distributed state.

This is problematic because the convergence times for state like "connection counts" between load balancers in different datacenters could be significantly higher than the rate at which that state itself is changing, and the cost to getting that state wrong is significantly higher latencies. That's where you start having to make CAP and latency tradeoffs.

Well, sure. Does that make stateless load balancers consistent, though? :) I just don't think the CAP terminology helps.
While I didn't state thate it is CAP isn't applicable one interesting point is that CAP concerns itself with distributed computer systems.

While I guess almost all systems built on top of heroku almost by definition needs to be distributed in some way heroku itself doesn't need to be. (Not saying it isn't.)

heroku itself doesn't need to be [distributed].

Yes, it does.