| I think it's more sad to expect others to divine the solution to your problems when they have no point of reference I didn't get any sense that the author was expecting others to divine the solution to his problems; I think he was just irritated because they were besieging him with "concern" without actually helping any. I think it's sad when expressions of love and concern are rebuffed with a dismissive, "But you don't understand." An expression of love and concern like "Hey, it seems like you're going through a rough time, I hope things work out for you, let me know if there's anything I can do to help" is one thing. That should be met with thanks, yes. An "expression of love and concern" like "I think you should do X" or "Have you tried Y?" is quite another. It is not really aimed at helping or comforting the person who is having a rough time; it is aimed at easing the emotions of the person who thinks they are being comforting. That is the sort of thing that might (and should) get met with "But you don't understand". Of course poor Aunt Sharon doesn't understand. Indeed. And therefore she should not presume to tell the person she doesn't understand how they should "fix" things. The issue isn't really that she doesn't understand; it's that she doesn't even know that she doesn't understand. it may take some effort on your part to frame your emotions to her experience. This is true, but Aunt Sharon has to be willing to meet you halfway. Many Aunt Sharons are not. |
Therein lies the contradiction. You presume the author isn't expecting solutions and yet he's justifiably irritated because other people aren't helping. I don't think he's justified at all.
So many presumptions about how other people should react and behave: expressions of love should be like this, auntie should know she doesn't understand...
Aunt Sharon has to be willing to meet you halfway
No, she doesn't; she needs to hear, "I don't need advice, I need you to listen."