| There are more crimes committed than the police can ever keep up with. So they prioritize crimes of varying types. Why have they prioritised ticketing members of the public on the freeways for minor speed offenses? The freeways are the safest roads by an order of magnitude when measured by accidents per mile traveled. Going 10mph over in a 60 mph compared to ten over in a 25 is a trivial increase in speed and danger. The freeway speed limits were set due to a temporary economic condition, why do we still have them? A blanket speed limit is madness when taking into account differing vehicles and differing driver abilities. A trained police pursuit driver with ten years of high speed escort duty, driving a modern porsche on a day off is limited to the same speed as a new driver in a 20 year old POS. So in answer to your question, yes the police should not use cameras or speed traps on the freeways and rural roads. A marked highly visible patrol car is a much better solution. Instead the police cars should be in town controlling speed where it is most likely to be fatal, should be concentrating on tail gating, should be prosecuting inattentive drivers, ticketing drivers with no lane control etc etc. Ticketing drivers on freeways for speeding can only be for one of two reasons either it's $$$ or it's bumping up the arrest/prosecution figures. |
In the Silicon Valley area, I've seen more in-town speed traps than on the freeway; I received one citation for 40 in a 25mph zone, and had other close calls. Maybe it's different where you live.
"...should be concentrating on tail gating, should be prosecuting inattentive drivers, ticketing drivers with no lane control etc etc." They probably don't do this as much as these violations are more subjective and harder to prove in court. Also there's some correlation between people who speed and people who tail-gate, etc.