|
|
|
|
|
by Turing_Machine
4864 days ago
|
|
Not really. Note the large number of strikes in the Sahara desert (and Antarctica, as someone else noted). There are at least two things going on here, probably more: 1) Population density
2) Ease of finding the meteorite or crater (this is easier in barren areas with relatively homogeneous terrain, like the desert and Antartica). |
|
In fact, the effects of 2) are reinforced even more, since my guess is that many, if not the majority of these findings were by scientific studies/surveys (note that they typically list the date found, not the date it occured). And since no one likes wasting their time, they would obviously pick areas where it would be easiest to find evidence.