[eshvk]

It is actually not that simple. I mean if it was, we wouldn't have countless reams of paper devoted to how to learn and comprehend better. Everyone comprehends things differently and sometime different perspectives help.

I thought the article was pretty decent as one man's perspective on how to learn algorithms. The whole talk through an algorithm reminds me of my real analysis class where the only way to comprehend and understand highly abstract proofs and constructs was to talk through them as if they were telling a story (which incidentally they are, except that it is a story that has been highly refined and evolved over 200 years which makes it appear very sophisticated.)