|
|
|
|
|
by bobsy
4874 days ago
|
|
I think it is obvious that WebKit has won and by a margin when it comes to browser engines. For Opera it is the best move for them. They can now focus the majority of their development time on making the browser great instead of putting a decent chunk of their development time in effectively replicating what WebKit does. I think in the coming year or so Opera will be become a far better browser for it. As for Mozilla and IE. You would expect Microsoft have more than enough resources to keep working on Trident/Lynx whatever it is called. For Mozilla is their OS tied to their own engine? I don't know how committed they are to it. For all the releases of Firefox tabs still aren't sandboxed and phpmyadmin often freezes the entire browser when looking at monster tables... perhaps they would benefit from spending more time improving the browser and less time working on rendering. I wonder what would have happened if Microsoft, Mozilla or Opera had open sourced their browser engine with WebKit. Perhaps we would have seen a split and more competition in this area. Now it is who has the $$$ to continue to develop their own propriety engine. |
|
Extremely, especially in this context. The reason why Opera is switching (web compatibility issues if you're not the dominant implementation) is exactly the reason why Mozilla would fight a switch with tooth and nail - and remember that unlike Opera they cannot care for profit when doing so.
Here's an extensive reply from a Firefox developer: http://www.quora.com/Mozilla-Firefox/Will-Firefox-ever-drop-...
I wonder what would have happened if Microsoft, Mozilla or Opera had open sourced their browser engine with WebKit.
I have no idea what you mean.