|
|
|
|
|
by jorgenev
4886 days ago
|
|
> lets keep being sexist, and bash etsy for trying No, lets stop circle jerking about how progressive we are at the expense of reason. > If women are discriminated against in IT (and lets face it ...) then there is a huge pool of under-tapped engineers out there If this was actually true, then people would try and keep it secret, because it could be so profitable. A true "huge pool of under-tapped" resources would sell itself, not have to be pushed so mindlessly. No one is bashing Etsy; it's just this concept is kind of silly, I could go on Monster.com, search for software engineers and only make offers to the female ones, that would get me an engineering team of 100% women! I am not sure that would prove anything, though. |
|
Anyone from these follow-a-cv-through-HR-to-hire apps got actual stats on application ratios by gender?
I have to admit I never stopped to look at why (the headlong rush perhaps) - most women I knew in IT had come up through the ranks in that company.
And now I think I should look at what happened - I want to know how to get 50/50 applications let alone actual hires.
But sorry. I reject the idea you could easily build a (qualified or even strong junior) team from women only by putting out an ad on a bog standard job site
It seems to take a lot more than that and it may be a mystery why