|
|
|
|
|
by UnoriginalGuy
4886 days ago
|
|
> How can a question "be wrong"? The question was misinformation. Git within its self doesn't offer a centralised storage system. The question implied it did. You didn't ask for a comparison, you implied there was no comparison to be made because Git already had it all. > You have yet to answer what Dropbox+git offers that git+backup system does not. Nothing. Same thing. |
|
Please tell me where the "misinformation" is in the following question:
And while we are at it please explain how I did not ask for a comparison?As far as "git does not offer a centralized storage system" goes, Scott Chacon seems to disagree with you:
"If you have a small team or are already comfortable with a centralized workflow in your company or team, you can easily continue using that workflow with Git. Simply set up a single repository, and give everyone on your team push access[1]"
You did not mention if you are a windows user. I imagine that you are if you are not aware of the options to run your own git server. Of the many ways to set up a git server that are presented in Pro Git[2] my favorite is gitolite[3]. But there are lots of other ways, I recommend you take a look at the the options for yourself.
[1] http://git-scm.com/book/en/Distributed-Git-Distributed-Workf...
[2] http://git-scm.com/book/en/Git-on-the-Server
[3] http://sitaramc.github.com/gitolite/g2/pictures.html