|
|
|
|
|
by ChuckMcM
4878 days ago
|
|
I chuckled because this same exchanged happened in my head when I read the article, my first thought was "Oh great, everyone stuck at the sink" followed by "Would they stay at the sink in practice?" I've seen a couple of air-blade installations, and in those they have slowed things down because paper towel dispensers allow you to take a towel, step back, and dry your hands while another person gets a towel. Rolling towels (ones where the towel is on a continuous loop) have the same issue of one user at a time. On the other hand ever every faucet was also a drying station you've basically upped the number of drying stations tremendously and that is a win for speed. Side benefits of keeping water off the sink/floor are good. I wonder if we'll ever see anyone taking this to the extreme of stalls with only water and air tools for washing up (Japanese style toilets for wiping, local air-taps for your hands). |
|
I largely agree with your points, but I wanted to point out that most modern bathrooms(and certainly not bathrooms that may have this device deployed) don't have paper towel dispensers. So it isn't a question of paper towels vs this technology, but this technology vs the hot air fan, or the dyson air blade, or other similar non-dead-tree tech