[robertlaing]

One of the more interesting things about this article, for me, was the fact that it's one of the few places where the author's [I assume unintentionally incorrect] use of the phrase "affect change" actually kind of makes sense. It's very common to make this mistake (http://grammarist.com/usage/affect-effect/), but it's very rare for it to make sense.

As in, architects may be able to "change" change. And that's maybe more interesting than the idea that they can create change.

"Planned and curated by dissident artist Ai Wei Wei, each pavilion represents a new path forward for architecture, at least in the mind of the designer." — Surely that's affecting change (changing "change").