Indeed. Anyone asserting that the current body of science is wrong about climate change should be able to back that up with data from non-questionable sources.
When you understand that there are no "non-questionable sources," you'll understand the point people are trying to make in this thread.
Extraordinary claims may or may not require extraordinary proof -- at least one famous environmentalist said so, anyway -- but extraordinary demands most certainly do.
Extraordinary claims may or may not require extraordinary proof -- at least one famous environmentalist said so, anyway -- but extraordinary demands most certainly do.