|
|
|
|
|
by taylorlb
4886 days ago
|
|
From Section 115 of the 1976 U.S. Copyright Act... (2) A compulsory license includes the privilege of making a musical arrangement of the work to the extent necessary to conform it to the style or manner of interpretation of the performance involved, but the arrangement shall not change the basic melody or fundamental character of the work, and shall not be subject to protection as a derivative work under this title, except with the express consent of the copyright owner. http://www.copyright.gov/title17/92chap1.html#115 EDIT: to be clear, a compulsory license is what Harry Fox grants you. |
|
Coulton does own the copyright to his unique arrangement because of its obvious creative and new nature.
But if Coulton only has a mechanical license covering non-creative arrangements, then Coulton has actually never had the right to distribute the creative derivative work. He still owns the copyright to the unique parts of the arrangement - everything but the lyrics - but he has no right to perform or sell this derivative arrangement because he has not negotiated a license to distribute a derivative work that changes the nature of the song, and the compulsory license was the wrong thing for him to get as it does not cover that.
Fox Network/Glee still doesn't have the right to distribute because they are violating Coulton's arrangement copyright, but Coulton also doesn't have the right to distribute because the compulsory license doesn't cover substantial changes.