Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by tunesmith 4890 days ago
Wow, those links are spectacular. Thanks for highlighting them.

Here's why this is an issue. Coulton released his sound recording under the Creative Commons, by-nc-sa . If they used his sound recording, Fox/Glee is infringing all three parts of that license:

- They didn't attribute - They released it commercially - They didn't release it share-alike

A creative commons license is additive, so they could have worked around it by contacting Coulton and getting permission ($$).

Since they did none of that, Coulton has legal grounds here, specifically relating to the use of the sound recording. In my IANAL opinion. :-)