|
|
|
|
|
|
by jacquesm
4887 days ago
|
|
|
You have been arguing this line in this and other threads quite vehemently and yet I can't escape the impression that you haven't even done the most basic research on the case under discussion. I'm confused. You're obviously quite clever and it appears to me that you have no dog in this race. Why not be more objective? |
|
|