|
|
|
|
|
by anactofgod
4888 days ago
|
|
Wrt "...the E you use to calculate P/E should actually be the long term expected earnings"... You may be thinking of Forward P/E. But Forward P/E only attempts to project earnings out 12 months. The E in P/E is the measure of actual earnings over time. The P/E ratio is, quite literally, the number of years required to pay back a stock's purchase price at constant dollars and earnings. AAPLs P/E ratio indicates it would take AAPL 10 years to pay back its current stock price. GOOG's indicates 20+ years. AMZN's P/E ratio indicates it would take over 3000 years to do the same. You may be right, and AAPL's P/E ratio may be closer to 5 than where it is currently (where the drop comes from a lower stock price). But then, so should AMZN's. |
|
I was not trying to say that the standard financial metric called P/E ratio should be calculated this way. Rather I think that ideally or principally it should be calculated this way, because what matters is "how many year will it take for me to recoup the money?", not "how many years will it take for me to recoup the money assuming that the company's earnings remains the same?".
But obviously you don't know the company's future earnings, so to make an actually computable metric you can only use the current earnings as an estimate.