You may own guns, but your statement is ignorant of the facts. Assault Rifles are machine guns, civilians in the US have been prohibited from buying any newly manufactured ones since 1986.
Not all machine guns are assault rifles, but assault rifles are by definition select-fire machine guns (burst or full auto), firing an intermediate cartridge, and of rifle-like design.
True machine guns like the M2, M240, M249 aren't assault rifles, nor are machine pistols.
We do need a new term for "military-style semi-automatic intermediate caliber rifles", but assault rifle is already used.
I'd suggest "black rifle" or "military-style rifle".
Maybe "Civilian Class" "Law enforcement class" and "Military class" buckets. And require various licensure for each category? (Its going to piss a lot of people off though...)
2) Progressive licensing for possession (various classes of weapons); license the owner, not the gun. A gangster with a .25acp pistol is a lot more of a problem than my .338 Lapua Magnum rifle.
3) Streamlining all existing regulations, which is a combination of eliminating ineffective/irrational stuff (SBR/SBS being more regulated than pistols, 922(r) parts counts, etc.) and strengthening other parts (licensing, treating handguns and semi-auto mag-fed rifles more strictly, etc.) Deregulate suppressors, deal with SBS/SBR, and raise the full-auto tax to $2500-5000 indexed to inflation, but also allow post-1986 automatics under that restrictive regulation.
That's effectively what we have now. Civilian-class is any semiautomatic, bolt-action, or single-shot weapon. Law-enforcement-class adds fully automatic weapons. Military class adds grenade launchers, proper machine guns, antiaircraft guns, artillery, naval guns....
There isn't a consensus definition of "assault rifle".
Some laws or proposed laws say a pistol grip and box magazine == "assault rifle". Most gun people would call a rifle that looks like an M-16, AK-47 or FN an assault rifle.
No private citizen can buy a machine gun today.
The dirty secret of the whole gun control thing is that most of the issues associated with people stockpiling weapons and smuggling pistols were dealt with in 1934 via an excise tax.
Basically, any short rifle and some pistols were subject to a $200 tax ($3400 today). Instead of blanket bans, the law defined classes of weapons and taxed them out of the market.
"There isn't a consensus definition of "assault rifle"."
Actually there is. What there isn't a consensus on is "Assault Weapons," which are different. "Assault Rifles" are illegal to own for US citizens, but "Assault Weapons" are not. They are two different things.
You can not buy a _new_ machine gun. The ones already registered are just like any other NFA item and can be transferred to anyone willing to pay the $200 tax.
Private citizens can import/manufacture machine guns provided they are properly licensed. These can't be sold to other private citizens however.
Subject to state law. Private citizens (i.e. not businesses in the trade) can't own them in WA or essentially in CA.
Seriously considering getting an FFL(07) for our company/office or a related entity once we have an office in a place like NV. Unclear if we want to just make suppressors (and keep post-1986 NFA items around for compatibility testing) or manufacture a range of NFA.
Mainly because now that crypto isn't so much an ITAR thing, I want a reason to register with ITAR again.