[josephlord]

> To anyone who knows more Ruby than I - is there a good reason against that I'm missing?

I probably know less Ruby than you but these are my thoughts.

1) I took me a while to work out what was happening but I finally figured out that the default value is only evaluated when the argument isn't present.

2) If the default value is indicated in the docs it would be wrong for the function to behave differently depending on whether that default was relied on explicitly sent. If you need to know this you are probably doing something wrong elsewhere.